The Frames of The Discourse of The Fourth Transformation

Keywords: Discourse frames theory, memory social frames, consensus, leadership, framing

Abstract

In Mexico’s 2018 presidential election, López Obrador ran as the candidate of a coalition of various political parties and leader of a social movement. Morena emerges as a social movement that becomes a party and its leader becomes president of the republic. These particular features place this research on the border between two fields (social movements and electoral studies) that have remained with little communication between one and the other. In this article, discourse frames model is proposed as an interdisciplinary perspective that highlights the centrality of the frame concept as a cornerstone in the development of a theory of public discourse. The leader communicates his vision of social change, initiates a process of breaking with the dominant framework (corruption) and replaces it with the framework of a new political and social order (the 4T). The framework of the fourth transformation consists of the process of social change that continues the three most important transformations in the history of Mexico.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Aquiles Chihu Amparan, Dr., Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Unidad Iztapalapa

Social anthropologist, doctor in political science, with studies in Italy as a student of Professor Umberto Cerroni. Second place in the national contest of stories about Zapatismo of the INAH, Morelos. Member of the SNI since 2000, currently level 2. I know Oaxaca, Morelos and Mexico City. I was a professor at the Autonomous University of Guerrero for eight years and entered the UAM in 1987.

References

Bartlett, F. (1995). Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.

Berger, P. y Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.

Chihu, A. (2021). Frames de la comunicación política. Spots de las campañas presidenciales 2000-2018. Gedisa.

Chihu, A. (2018). Frames del discurso público en la arena política del 68. Polis, Anuario de Sociología 14(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.24275/uam/izt/dcsh/polis/2018v14n1/Chiu

Chihu, A. (2013). Earth's Color March”. En The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social & Political Movements, (pp. 381-382). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm276

Chihu, A. (2012). La teoría del framing: un paradigma interdisciplinario. Acta Sociológica, (59), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.22201/fcpys.24484938e.2012.59.33119

Chihu, A. (2007). Marcos interpretativos, identidad e imaginario en el mexica movement. región y sociedad, 19(38), 51-76. https://doi.org/10.22198/rys.2007.38.a557

Chihu, A. (2006). El análisis de los marcos en la sociología de los movimientos sociales. Miguel Ángel Porrúa-UAM-Iztapalapa.

Chihu, A. (2002). Sociología de la identidad. Miguel Ángel Porrúa-UAM-I.

Chihu, A. (1999). Estrategias simbólicas y marcos para la acción colectiva. Polis, Anuario de Sociología (99), 41-65. https://polismexico.izt.uam.mx/index.php/rp/article/view/364/359

Donati, P. (1992). Political discourse analysis. En M. Diani y R. Eyerman (Eds.), Studying collective action (pp. 136-167). Sage Publications.

Edelman, M. (1964). The symbolic uses of politics. University of Illinois Press.

Entman, R. (2004). Projections of power: Framing news, public opinion, and US foreign policy. University of Chicago Press.

Gamson, W. y Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American journal of sociology, 95(1), 1-37. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780405

Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Harper and Row.

Halbwachs, M. (2004). Los marcos sociales de la memoria. Anthropos.

Hare, P. y Blumberg, H. (1988). Dramaturgical analysis of social interaction. Praeger Publishers.

Kinder, D. y Sanders, L. (1990). Mimicking political debate with survey questions: The case of white opinion on affirmative action for blacks. Social Cognition 8(1), 73-103. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1990.8.1.73

Melucci, A. (1989). Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society, Hutchinson Radius.

Moscovici, S. (1979). El psicoanálisis: su imagen y su público. Huemul.

Moyer, B., MacAllister, J. y Soifer, S. (2001). Doing democracy: The MAP model for organizing social movements. New Society Publishers

Piaget, J. (1970). Naturaleza y métodos de la epistemología. Proteo.

Piven, F. y Cloward, R. (2012). Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. Pantheon.

Snow, D. (2013). Framing and social movements. En D., Snow, D. Della Porta, B. Klandermans y D. McAdam (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social & Political Movements (pp. 470–475). Blackwell.
Published
2024-01-05
How to Cite
Chihu Amparan, A. (2024). The Frames of The Discourse of The Fourth Transformation. Revista Mexicana De Estudios De Los Movimientos Sociales, 8(1). Retrieved from http://www.revistamovimientos.mx/ojs/index.php/movimientos/article/view/339