El modelo de coaliciones promotoras:
puente para la integración del enfoque de políticas públicas y la sociología de los movimientos sociales
Palabras clave:
políticas públicas, movimientos sociales, modelo de coaliciones promotoras
Resumen
El objetivo del artículo es argumentar la utilidad del modelo de coaliciones promotoras para articular la integración de la corriente de políticas públicas con la sociología de los movimientos sociales. A partir de una revisión de la literatura se analizan las premisas teóricas de los tres modelos y se llega a la conclusión de que dicha integración es posible ya que coinciden en tener como objeto el análisis de agendas y procesos de cambio político, además de que han incorporado desde su formación referentes teóricos compartidos con la sociología política y premisas sobre el proceso político, asimismo compartidas con la sociología de los movimientos sociales.
Descargas
La descarga de datos todavía no está disponible.
Citas
Abelson, Donald E. (2009). Do Think Tanks Matter? Assessing the Impact of Public Policy Institutes. Montreal: McGill-Quenn’s University Press.
Agnone, Jon (2007). “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement”. Social Forces 85(4)
Aguilar Villanueva, Luis F. (ed.) (1992). Antología de políticas públicas. México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa
Amenta, E., D. Halfmann y M. Young (1999). “The Strategies and Contexts of Social Protests: Political Mediation and the Impact of the Townsed Movement in California”. Mobilization. An International Journal 4(1)
Aralal, Eduardo, Scott Fritzen, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh, Xun Wu (2012). Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
Baumgartner, Frank (2016). “John Kingdon and the evolutionary approach to public policy and agenda setting”. Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Londres: Edward Edgar Publishing
Baumgartner, Frank y Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birkland, Thomas A. (2001). An Introduction to the Policy Process. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Branton, Regina, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, Tony E Carey Jr., y, Tetsuya Matsubayashi (2015). “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies”. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2)
Brewer, Garry y Peter DeLeon (1983). The Foundations of Policy Analysis. California: Brooks/ Cole Púb. Co.
Burstein, Paul y Sarah Sausner (2005). “The Incidence and Impact of Policy-Oriented Collective Action: Competing Views”. Sociological Forum 20(3).
Cabrero Mendoza, Enrique (2000). “Usos y costumbres en la hechura de políticas públicas en México: límites de las policy sciences en contextos cultural y políticamente diferentes”. Gestión y Política Pública. 9(2).
Canto, Rodolfo (2000). “Políticas Públicas. Más allá del pluralismo y la participación ciudadana”. Gestión y Política Pública, 9 (2).
Cobb, Roger (1976). “Agenda Building as Comparative Political Process”. The American Political Science Review, 70 (1).
Cobb, Roger y Charles, Elder (1971). “The Politics of Agenda Building: An alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory” The Journal of Politics 33 (4).
Cortez, Mauricio, y Antoine, Maillet(2018). “Trayectoria multinivel de una coalición promotora e incidencia en la agenda política nacional. El caso del conflicto de Pascua Lama y la ley de glaciares en Chile”. Colombia Internacional, 94.
Cruz, Teresita (2014). The State and the Advocate: Case studies on Development Policy in Asia. New York: Routledge.
Dahl, Robert Alan (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert Alan (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dalton, Russel, Steve Reccia, y Robert Rohrschneider (2003). “The Enviromental Movement and the Modes of Political Action”. Comparative Political Studies, 20(10).
Dearing, James y Everett M. Rogers (1996). Agenda Setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Leon, Peter (1995). “Democratic Values and the Policy Sciences”. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4).
De Leon, Peter y Christine Martell (2006). “The Policy Sciences: Past, Present and Future”. B Guy Peters y Jon Pierre (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 31-48
Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Michael Howleet y David Laycock (eds) (2005). Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Domhoff, William (1978). Who really rules? New Haven and community power re-examined. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Domhoff, William (2005). Who really ruled in Dahl’s New Haven? Consultado en: Yehezkel Dror (1968). Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards, Bob y John McCarty (2004) “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization” En D. Snow, S. Soule y H. Kriesi, The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Wiley
Edwards, Bob y Patrick Gillham (2013). “Resource Mobilization Theory”. En: The Blackwell-Wiley Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Blackwell.
Favela, Margarita (2002). “La estructura de oportunidades políticas de los movimientos sociales en sistemas cerrados: examen del caso mexicano”. Estudios Sociológicos, 20(58).
Fischer, Frank y Gerald J. Miller (ed.) (2006). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Florida: CRC Press.
Gamson, William (1990). The Strategy of Social Protest. Ann Arbor: The University of MichiganPress.
Gamson, William (1999). “Politics, Social Movements and the State”. Contemporary Sociology, 28 (3).
Geenstein, Fred y Nelson Polsby (1975). Handbook of Political Science. [vol. 6] Policies and Policemaking] Massachussets: Addison-Wesley.
Giugni, Marco (1998). “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology n. 98.
Goodin, E. Robert, Michael Moran y Martin Rein (ed.) (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, Jeff y JamesM. Jasper (1999). “Caugt in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory”. Sociological Forum, 14(1).
Guerrero, Omar (1997). “Las políticas públicas antes de las ciencias de las políticas”. Política y Gestión Pública, 6(2).
Hayes, J. (2008). An Examination of the Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Tesis de doctorado, Michigan State University.
Hojnacki, Marie, et al. (2012). “Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research”. Annual Review of Political Science n.15.
Hunter, F. (1953). Community Power Structure: a Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Hunter, Floyd (1980). Community power succession: Atlanta›s policy-makers revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Ingram, de Leon y Anne Schneider (2016) Conclusion: Public Theory Policy and Democracy: The Elephant in the Corner. En: Contemporary Policy Approaches, Theories, Controversies and Perspectives. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.
Jenkins, Craig (1983). “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology, n. 9.
Kingdon, John W. (2003). Agendas Alternatives and Public Policies. Indiana: Addison-Wesley.
Kubler, Daniel (2001). “Understanding Policy Change with the Advocacy Coalition Framework”. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (4).
Lane, Robert (1959) Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Lasswell, Harold (1951) “The Policy Orientation”, En: Daniel Lerner y Harold Lasswell, The
Policy Sciences, Stanford University Press, 1951 Lasswell, Harold (1971). “The emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences”. Policy Sciences, 1 (1).
Lazarsfeld, Paul, et al. (1944). The people›s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lindblom, Charles (1958). “Policy Analysis”. The American Economic Review, 48(3).
Lindblom, Charles (1959). “The science of muddling through”. Public Administration Review,19 (2).
Lindblom, Charles (1968). The policy-making process. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lindblom, Charles (1979). “Still muddling, not yet through”. Public Administration Review, 39(6).
Lipsky, Michael (1968). “Protest as Political Resource”. The American Political Science Review, 62(4).
López, Miguel Armando (2012) Los movimientos sociales y su influencia en el ciclo de las políticas públicas. Revista Región y Sociedad, 24 (55). México: El Colegio de Sonora.
Maldonado, Claudia y Amaparo Casar (2008). Formación de agenda y procesos de toma de decisiones: una aproximación desde la ciencia política. Documento de trabajo 207. México: CIDE.
Manley, John F. (1983). “Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II”. The American Political Science Review, 77(2).
McAdam, Doug (1998). “Orígenes conceptuales, problemas actuales y direcciones futuras”. En: Ibarra, P. y B. Tijerina (ed.) Los Movimientos Sociales. Valladolid: Trotta.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow y Charles Tilly (2001) The Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarty, John D y MayerN. Zald (1977). “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A partial Theory”. The American Journal of Sociology, 82 (6).
McCombs, Maxwell E (1993). “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas”. Journal of Communication, 43 (2).
McCombs, Maxwell E. y Donald L. Shaw (1972). “The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2).
Merriam, Charles E. (1921) “The Present State Of The Study Of Politics”. American Political Science Review, 15 (2).
Meyer, David S (2004). “Protest and Political Opportunities”. Annual Review of Sociology n. 30.
Meyer, David S. y Douglas Imig (1993). “Political Opportunity and the Rise and Decline of Interest Groups Sectors”. The Social Science Journal, 30 (3).
Milibrath, Lester (1958). “The Political Party Activity of Washington Lobbyists”. The Journal of Politics, 20 (2).
Miller, Warren y Donald Stokes (1963). “Constituency influences in Congress”. American Political Science Review, 57.
Mills, Charles (1957). La elite del poder. México: FCE.
Newton, Ken (1969). “A Critique of the Pluralist Model”. Acta Sociologica, 12(4).
Ostrom, Elinor (1982). Strategies of Political Enquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Ostrom, Elinor (2011). “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1).
Palacios-Valladares, Indira, y Gabriel Ondetti (2018). “Student Protest and the Nueva Mayoría Reforms in Chile” Bulletin of Latin American Research.
Parry, Geraint (2005). Political Elites. Colchester: European Consortium of Political Research.
Pérez, Julia (2016). “Acuerdos y Tensiones dentro de la Izquierda Política Uruguaya en Materia de Educación Media: Un Aporte desde el Marco de las Coaliciónes Promotoras”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 25.
Peters, Guy (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Peters, Guy y Philippe Zittoun (ed.) (2016). “Introduction”. En: Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
Peters, Guy y Jon Pierre (ed.) (2006). “Introduction”. En: Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Sage.
Pump, Barry (2011). “Beyond Methapores: New Research on Agendas in the Policy Process”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1).
Ramos, María Luisa (1997) “La dimensión política de los movimientos sociales: algunos problemas conceptuales”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas n. 79. Madrid: CISS.
Rich, Andrew (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rocheford David y Rochefort Cobb (1994). “Problem Definition: An Emerging Perspective”. En: The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Rocheford David y Rochefort Cobb (1993). “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice”. Policy Studies Journal, 21 (1).
Rochon, Thomas y Daniel Mazmanian (1993). “Social Movements and the Policy Process”. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, n. 528.
Sabatier, Paul (1987). “Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework”. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion and Utilization, 8 (4).
Sabatier, Paul (1991). “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process”. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24 (2).
Sabatier, Paul (1999). “The Need for Better Theories”. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul y Hank Jenkins-Smith (1999). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment”.
Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press. Sabatier, Paul y Christopher Weible (2007). “The advocacy coalition: Innovations and clarifications”. En Sabatier, Paul (Ed.) Theories of the policy Process. Boulder: WestviewPres.
Schattschneider, Elmer (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist›s View of Democracy in America. Chicago: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Schooler, Dean (1970). “Political Arenas, Life Styles and the Impact of Technologies of Policy Making”. Policy Sciences, 1 (3).
Shafritz, Jay et al. (ed.) (2005). Classics of Public Policy. New York: Pearson.
Stone, Diane (1996). Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.
Tarrow, Sidney (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Tilly, Charles (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Sage.
Truman, David (1971). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Turnbull, Nick (2010). “Harold Lasswell›s Problem Orientation for the Policy Sciences”. Critical Political Analysis, 2 (1).
Verba, Sidney y Norman Nie (1987). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Walter, Jack (1966). “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy”. The American Political Science Review, 60 (2).
Weible, Christopher, et al. (2008). “Advocacy Coalition Framework”. En: Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. Taylor & Francis.
Weible, Christopher et al. (2011). “A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (3).
Weible, Christopher, et al. (2012). “Understanding and Influencing the Policy Process”. Policy Sciences, 45 (1).
Weible, Christopher y Hank Jenkins (2016). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework”. En: Peters, G. y F. Zittoun, Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy. New York: Palgrave.
Agnone, Jon (2007). “Amplifying Public Opinion: The Policy Impact of the U.S. Environmental Movement”. Social Forces 85(4)
Aguilar Villanueva, Luis F. (ed.) (1992). Antología de políticas públicas. México: Miguel Ángel Porrúa
Amenta, E., D. Halfmann y M. Young (1999). “The Strategies and Contexts of Social Protests: Political Mediation and the Impact of the Townsed Movement in California”. Mobilization. An International Journal 4(1)
Aralal, Eduardo, Scott Fritzen, Michael Howlett, M. Ramesh, Xun Wu (2012). Routledge Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Routledge.
Baumgartner, Frank (2016). “John Kingdon and the evolutionary approach to public policy and agenda setting”. Handbook of Public Policy Agenda Setting. Londres: Edward Edgar Publishing
Baumgartner, Frank y Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Birkland, Thomas A. (2001). An Introduction to the Policy Process. New York: M.E. Sharpe.
Branton, Regina, Valerie Martinez-Ebers, Tony E Carey Jr., y, Tetsuya Matsubayashi (2015). “Social Protest and Policy Attitudes: The Case of the 2006 Immigrant Rallies”. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2)
Brewer, Garry y Peter DeLeon (1983). The Foundations of Policy Analysis. California: Brooks/ Cole Púb. Co.
Burstein, Paul y Sarah Sausner (2005). “The Incidence and Impact of Policy-Oriented Collective Action: Competing Views”. Sociological Forum 20(3).
Cabrero Mendoza, Enrique (2000). “Usos y costumbres en la hechura de políticas públicas en México: límites de las policy sciences en contextos cultural y políticamente diferentes”. Gestión y Política Pública. 9(2).
Canto, Rodolfo (2000). “Políticas Públicas. Más allá del pluralismo y la participación ciudadana”. Gestión y Política Pública, 9 (2).
Cobb, Roger (1976). “Agenda Building as Comparative Political Process”. The American Political Science Review, 70 (1).
Cobb, Roger y Charles, Elder (1971). “The Politics of Agenda Building: An alternative Perspective for Modern Democratic Theory” The Journal of Politics 33 (4).
Cortez, Mauricio, y Antoine, Maillet(2018). “Trayectoria multinivel de una coalición promotora e incidencia en la agenda política nacional. El caso del conflicto de Pascua Lama y la ley de glaciares en Chile”. Colombia Internacional, 94.
Cruz, Teresita (2014). The State and the Advocate: Case studies on Development Policy in Asia. New York: Routledge.
Dahl, Robert Alan (1961). Who Governs? Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl, Robert Alan (1971). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dalton, Russel, Steve Reccia, y Robert Rohrschneider (2003). “The Enviromental Movement and the Modes of Political Action”. Comparative Political Studies, 20(10).
Dearing, James y Everett M. Rogers (1996). Agenda Setting. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
De Leon, Peter (1995). “Democratic Values and the Policy Sciences”. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4).
De Leon, Peter y Christine Martell (2006). “The Policy Sciences: Past, Present and Future”. B Guy Peters y Jon Pierre (eds.) Handbook of Public Policy. Thousand Oaks: Sage, pp. 31-48
Dobuzinskis, Laurent, Michael Howleet y David Laycock (eds) (2005). Policy Analysis in Canada: The State of the Art. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Domhoff, William (1978). Who really rules? New Haven and community power re-examined. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
Domhoff, William (2005). Who really ruled in Dahl’s New Haven? Consultado en: Yehezkel Dror (1968). Public Policymaking Reexamined. San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Company.
Easton, David (1965). A Framework for Political Analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Edwards, Bob y John McCarty (2004) “Resources and Social Movement Mobilization” En D. Snow, S. Soule y H. Kriesi, The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Wiley
Edwards, Bob y Patrick Gillham (2013). “Resource Mobilization Theory”. En: The Blackwell-Wiley Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Blackwell.
Favela, Margarita (2002). “La estructura de oportunidades políticas de los movimientos sociales en sistemas cerrados: examen del caso mexicano”. Estudios Sociológicos, 20(58).
Fischer, Frank y Gerald J. Miller (ed.) (2006). Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics and Methods. Florida: CRC Press.
Gamson, William (1990). The Strategy of Social Protest. Ann Arbor: The University of MichiganPress.
Gamson, William (1999). “Politics, Social Movements and the State”. Contemporary Sociology, 28 (3).
Geenstein, Fred y Nelson Polsby (1975). Handbook of Political Science. [vol. 6] Policies and Policemaking] Massachussets: Addison-Wesley.
Giugni, Marco (1998). “Was It Worth the Effort? The Outcomes and Consequences of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology n. 98.
Goodin, E. Robert, Michael Moran y Martin Rein (ed.) (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy. Oxford University Press.
Goodwin, Jeff y JamesM. Jasper (1999). “Caugt in a Winding, Snarling Vine: The Structural Bias of Political Process Theory”. Sociological Forum, 14(1).
Guerrero, Omar (1997). “Las políticas públicas antes de las ciencias de las políticas”. Política y Gestión Pública, 6(2).
Hayes, J. (2008). An Examination of the Advocacy Coalition Framework and the Punctuated Equilibrium Theory. Tesis de doctorado, Michigan State University.
Hojnacki, Marie, et al. (2012). “Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence: Reexamining Interest Group Research”. Annual Review of Political Science n.15.
Hunter, F. (1953). Community Power Structure: a Study of Decision Makers. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Hunter, Floyd (1980). Community power succession: Atlanta›s policy-makers revisited. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
Ingram, de Leon y Anne Schneider (2016) Conclusion: Public Theory Policy and Democracy: The Elephant in the Corner. En: Contemporary Policy Approaches, Theories, Controversies and Perspectives. Londres: Palgrave McMillan.
Jenkins, Craig (1983). “Resource Mobilization Theory and the Study of Social Movements”. Annual Review of Sociology, n. 9.
Kingdon, John W. (2003). Agendas Alternatives and Public Policies. Indiana: Addison-Wesley.
Kubler, Daniel (2001). “Understanding Policy Change with the Advocacy Coalition Framework”. Journal of European Public Policy, 8 (4).
Lane, Robert (1959) Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics. Glencoe: The Free Press.
Lasswell, Harold (1951) “The Policy Orientation”, En: Daniel Lerner y Harold Lasswell, The
Policy Sciences, Stanford University Press, 1951 Lasswell, Harold (1971). “The emerging Conception of the Policy Sciences”. Policy Sciences, 1 (1).
Lazarsfeld, Paul, et al. (1944). The people›s choice: how the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lindblom, Charles (1958). “Policy Analysis”. The American Economic Review, 48(3).
Lindblom, Charles (1959). “The science of muddling through”. Public Administration Review,19 (2).
Lindblom, Charles (1968). The policy-making process. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Lindblom, Charles (1979). “Still muddling, not yet through”. Public Administration Review, 39(6).
Lipsky, Michael (1968). “Protest as Political Resource”. The American Political Science Review, 62(4).
López, Miguel Armando (2012) Los movimientos sociales y su influencia en el ciclo de las políticas públicas. Revista Región y Sociedad, 24 (55). México: El Colegio de Sonora.
Maldonado, Claudia y Amaparo Casar (2008). Formación de agenda y procesos de toma de decisiones: una aproximación desde la ciencia política. Documento de trabajo 207. México: CIDE.
Manley, John F. (1983). “Neo-Pluralism: A Class Analysis of Pluralism I and Pluralism II”. The American Political Science Review, 77(2).
McAdam, Doug (1998). “Orígenes conceptuales, problemas actuales y direcciones futuras”. En: Ibarra, P. y B. Tijerina (ed.) Los Movimientos Sociales. Valladolid: Trotta.
McAdam, Doug, Sidney Tarrow y Charles Tilly (2001) The Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McCarty, John D y MayerN. Zald (1977). “Resource Mobilization and Social Movements: A partial Theory”. The American Journal of Sociology, 82 (6).
McCombs, Maxwell E (1993). “The Evolution of Agenda-Setting Research: Twenty-Five Years in the Marketplace of Ideas”. Journal of Communication, 43 (2).
McCombs, Maxwell E. y Donald L. Shaw (1972). “The Agenda Setting Function of Mass Media”. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36 (2).
Merriam, Charles E. (1921) “The Present State Of The Study Of Politics”. American Political Science Review, 15 (2).
Meyer, David S (2004). “Protest and Political Opportunities”. Annual Review of Sociology n. 30.
Meyer, David S. y Douglas Imig (1993). “Political Opportunity and the Rise and Decline of Interest Groups Sectors”. The Social Science Journal, 30 (3).
Milibrath, Lester (1958). “The Political Party Activity of Washington Lobbyists”. The Journal of Politics, 20 (2).
Miller, Warren y Donald Stokes (1963). “Constituency influences in Congress”. American Political Science Review, 57.
Mills, Charles (1957). La elite del poder. México: FCE.
Newton, Ken (1969). “A Critique of the Pluralist Model”. Acta Sociologica, 12(4).
Ostrom, Elinor (1982). Strategies of Political Enquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.
Ostrom, Elinor (2011). “Background on the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1).
Palacios-Valladares, Indira, y Gabriel Ondetti (2018). “Student Protest and the Nueva Mayoría Reforms in Chile” Bulletin of Latin American Research.
Parry, Geraint (2005). Political Elites. Colchester: European Consortium of Political Research.
Pérez, Julia (2016). “Acuerdos y Tensiones dentro de la Izquierda Política Uruguaya en Materia de Educación Media: Un Aporte desde el Marco de las Coaliciónes Promotoras”. Revista Uruguaya de Ciencia Política, 25.
Peters, Guy (2015). Advanced Introduction to Public Policy. London: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Peters, Guy y Philippe Zittoun (ed.) (2016). “Introduction”. En: Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy. Palgrave MacMillan.
Peters, Guy y Jon Pierre (ed.) (2006). “Introduction”. En: Handbook of Public Policy. New York: Sage.
Pump, Barry (2011). “Beyond Methapores: New Research on Agendas in the Policy Process”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (1).
Ramos, María Luisa (1997) “La dimensión política de los movimientos sociales: algunos problemas conceptuales”. Revista Española de Investigaciones Sociológicas n. 79. Madrid: CISS.
Rich, Andrew (2004). Think Tanks, Public Policy and the Politics of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rocheford David y Rochefort Cobb (1994). “Problem Definition: An Emerging Perspective”. En: The Politics of Problem Definition: Shaping the Policy Agenda. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Rocheford David y Rochefort Cobb (1993). “Problem Definition, Agenda Access, and Policy Choice”. Policy Studies Journal, 21 (1).
Rochon, Thomas y Daniel Mazmanian (1993). “Social Movements and the Policy Process”. Annals of the American Academy of Political Science, n. 528.
Sabatier, Paul (1987). “Knowledge, Policy-Oriented Learning and Policy Change: An Advocacy Coalition Framework”. Knowledge, Creation, Diffusion and Utilization, 8 (4).
Sabatier, Paul (1991). “Toward Better Theories of the Policy Process”. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24 (2).
Sabatier, Paul (1999). “The Need for Better Theories”. Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, Paul y Hank Jenkins-Smith (1999). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment”.
Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press. Sabatier, Paul y Christopher Weible (2007). “The advocacy coalition: Innovations and clarifications”. En Sabatier, Paul (Ed.) Theories of the policy Process. Boulder: WestviewPres.
Schattschneider, Elmer (1960). The Semisovereign People: A Realist›s View of Democracy in America. Chicago: Holt Rinehart and Winston.
Schooler, Dean (1970). “Political Arenas, Life Styles and the Impact of Technologies of Policy Making”. Policy Sciences, 1 (3).
Shafritz, Jay et al. (ed.) (2005). Classics of Public Policy. New York: Pearson.
Stone, Diane (1996). Capturing the Political Imagination: Think Tanks and the Policy Process. London: Frank Cass.
Tarrow, Sidney (1998). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, Charles (1978). From Mobilization to Revolution. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
Tilly, Charles (1984). Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Sage.
Truman, David (1971). The Governmental Process: Political Interests and Public Opinion. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Turnbull, Nick (2010). “Harold Lasswell›s Problem Orientation for the Policy Sciences”. Critical Political Analysis, 2 (1).
Verba, Sidney y Norman Nie (1987). Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Walter, Jack (1966). “A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy”. The American Political Science Review, 60 (2).
Weible, Christopher, et al. (2008). “Advocacy Coalition Framework”. En: Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. Taylor & Francis.
Weible, Christopher et al. (2011). “A Quarter Century of the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Introduction to the Special Issue”. Policy Studies Journal, 39 (3).
Weible, Christopher, et al. (2012). “Understanding and Influencing the Policy Process”. Policy Sciences, 45 (1).
Weible, Christopher y Hank Jenkins (2016). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework”. En: Peters, G. y F. Zittoun, Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy. New York: Palgrave.
Publicado
2021-06-26
Cómo citar
Flores-Mariscal, J. (2021). El modelo de coaliciones promotoras:. Revista Mexicana De Estudios De Los Movimientos Sociales, 5(2), 53-79. Recuperado a partir de http://www.revistamovimientos.mx/ojs/index.php/movimientos/article/view/234
Sección
Artículos de investigación
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
Movimientos. Revista Mexicana de Estudios de los Movimientos Sociales by Red Mexicana de Estudios de los Movimientos Sociales is licensed under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional License.
Creado a partir de la obra en http://www.revistamovimientos.mx/2016/index.php/movimientos.
